TPM is falling behind, and it’s costing manufacturers more than they realize.
In an age of digital transformation, AI integration, and growing pressure for sustainable operations, Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) as we know it may no longer be fit for purpose. And while Kaizen events and Six Sigma projects are useful, they can only go so far without rethinking reliability at the design level.
Let’s break it down:
🛠️ 1: Is TPM Still Relevant in Industry 5.0?
TPM was built for an era of stable production, slow technological change, and a clear division between maintenance and operations.
But today?
- Factories are digitized.
- Workforces are hybrid.
- Customer demands change overnight.
TPM’s traditional pillars, while solid, are too rigid for the flexible, people-first approach demanded by Industry 5.0.
Industry 5.0 is about collaboration between humans and machines. It values adaptability, creativity, and worker empowerment. In contrast, TPM often becomes just another checklist, disconnected from the frontline experience.
❝ If your TPM program is more about compliance than engagement, it’s already outdated. ❞
So yes, TPM can still be relevant, but only if it evolves. That means shifting from a purely mechanical framework to one that centers on human intelligence, agility, and digital integration.
📊 2: Can Kaizen and Six Sigma Drive Long-Term Impact—Or Are We Just Tinkering?
We’ve all seen it: the Kaizen blitz that improves OEE by 5%… only for things to slide back three months later.
Short-term projects are useful, but they’re not a strategy.
Here’s the uncomfortable truth:
- Many organizations run Kaizen events like bandaids.
- Six Sigma is often deployed without building the cultural foundation needed to sustain it.
- Without aligning these initiatives to a broader Design for Reliability (DFR) mindset, the gains rarely stick.
DFR, on the other hand, forces you to think long-term. It involves cross-functional design thinking, engineering foresight, and human-centered systems that bake reliability into the DNA of your plant, not just the end product.
Want sustainable performance? Stop firefighting. Start designing for it.
What’s the Solution?
We need a hybrid strategy, one that respects the roots of TPM but isn’t afraid to branch out into new terrain:
- Embed Design for Reliability principles early in the equipment lifecycle.
- Align short-term wins (Kaizen/Six Sigma) with long-term goals (DFR/People Development).
- Train people to think, not just comply.
- Replace rigid TPM audits with dynamic, human-centered metrics.
💡 Final Thoughts: Maintenance is No Longer Just a Department—It’s a Competitive Advantage
If you’re not evolving your reliability strategy, you’re slowly falling behind.
The winners in Industry 5.0 will be the companies that:
- Design with people in mind
- Think beyond downtime
- Turn maintenance into innovation
At Learnmar, we help organizations modernize their approach to TPM, reliability, and continuous improvement with training and tools built for the real world, not the ideal one.
🔍 Want to explore how we help teams implement human-centric reliability frameworks?
Visit Learnmar.com to start your transformation today.
One Response